Hoi,<br>A similar study is done to complete the ISO 639-6 data. In
stead of doing this twice, the preliminary data for the ISO-DIS-639-6
should be considered. This will save a lot of heart ache when it is
found that the two studies do not reach the same results. Given that
ISO 639-6 will lead to changes here in the future...<br>
Thanks,<br> GerardM<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:59 PM, CE Whitehead <<a href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<pre> <br>Hi. A fresh request is fine with me since it would be helpful to know the prefix.</pre><pre>However, I thought Ciarán and John were 'working out' what the various subtags for German/German languages
[gem], [de] meant ). Will they be submitting a request for an update--to help end this open-ended study? Or is
that no longer on the table either?<br> <br>--C. E. Whitehead<br><font face="Courier New"></font></pre>
<b>Frank Ellermann</b> <a title="Modification request: gsw (new Description)" href="mailto:ietf-languages%40alvestrand.no?Subject=Modification%20request%3A%20gsw%20%28new%20Description%29&In-Reply-To=" target="_blank"><u><font color="#0000ff">nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de </font></u></a><br>
<i>Fri Mar 21 11:16:14 CET 2008</i> <br>> Indeed, a fresh request later is simpler than than starting to<br>> emulate a "pending request tracker" with this mailing list.<br><br> <br>Michael Everson everson at <a href="http://evertype.com" target="_blank">evertype.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ietf-languages%40alvestrand.no?Subject=Modification%20request%3A%20gsw%20%28new%20Description%29&In-Reply-To=frvstt%24jkl%241%40ger.gmane.org" target="_blank">ietf-languages%40alvestrand.no?Subject=Modification%20request%3A%20gsw%20%28new%20Description%29&In-Reply-To=frvstt%24jkl%241%40ger.gmane.org</a>><br>
Fri Mar 21 10:02:49 CET 2008<br>> At 09:53 +0100 2008-03-21, Frank Ellermann wrote:<br> <br>>>What is the outcome for the pending erzgeb request ? The last<br>>>I have heard was that Michael has no problem with it, and that<br>
>>Karen deferred the decision for further studies.<br> <br> <br>>At this point it means I reject the request without prejudice.>Since<br>>further study seems to be open ended, we should close the book<br>
>on<br>>this.<br>Open-ended?<br> <br>I thought Ciarán and John <br>
were 'working out' what the various subtags for German/German languages [gem], [de] meant ). Can't they at least send a request for an update to? Or is that no longer on the table too?<br>
<br> <br>--C. E. Whitehead<br><a href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com" target="_blank">cewcathar@hotmail.com</a><br><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Ietf-languages mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no">Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>