<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">No complaints with that. - Karen</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">08/25/2007 05:34 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: (Revised) LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION
FORM</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>At 01:25 +0100 2007-08-26, Caoimhin O Donnaile wrote:<br>
<br>
>(1) It would be better to change "Scots Gaelic" to "Scottish
Gaelic". <br>
>There is nothing wrong with "Scots Gaelic" as a historic
term,<br>
>but "Scottish Gaelic" is what the language would be called
by English<br>
>speakers in Scotland today, and it avoids the possibility of confusion<br>
>with "Scots" which is a totally different language.<br>
<br>
I will insist upon this change.<br>
-- <br>
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ietf-languages mailing list<br>
Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no<br>
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages<br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br>