I don't think there will ever be such a rush for any ISO codes that we need to circumvent a short waiting period.<br><br>mark<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Doug Ewell</b>
<<a href="mailto:dewell@roadrunner.com">dewell@roadrunner.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Is there any requirement, in either draft-4646bis or in our discussions,
<br>that final records be posted to ietf-languages for a week-long review<br>when the only changes are due to changes in the ISO standards?<br><br>If not, we can send the new ISO 15924-based changes immediately.<br><br>--
<br>Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14<br><a href="http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/">http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/</a><br><a href="http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html">
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html</a><br><a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Ltru mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Ltru@ietf.org">Ltru@ietf.org</a><br><a href="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru">https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Mark