<br><br><b><i>Yury Tarasievich <yury.tarasievich@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> No, no. *I'm not* proposing *any* subtags here.<br><br>I just give a bit of *historical background*, as some people asked.<br><br>I don't know how the subtags here are defined, so really can't say how<br>many of Latin "should" be there. For all *practical* purposes, you<br>could give out *one* and be done with it. But I don't know the<br>procedure here.<br><br>There was no separate orthography for Latin script, only additional<br>(Polish-like) rule for "L+vowel". By the charset alone, there were<br>strictly 1) Polish set (mostly 19th cent), 2) Polish+specific letter<br>"U short" (since end 19th cent.), 3) previous with Czech letters<br>replacing Polish cz sz z circle (c. mid.1910s), 4) previous with V<br>replacing W (since end 1930s). I don't have statisticals on how much<br>of what
was used in printing.<br><br>Folks, perhaps I'm just boring you and impending the decision process?<br><br></blockquote>Thanks very much Yuri; I was totally lost before when you mentioned the Latin script varieties; now it's much more clear to me what's going on; I need this kind of background to make sense of anything so thanks from me.<br><br>As you're not requesting any special subtag for the Latin at this point then this is information in case someone does in the future.<br><br>Sincerely,<br><br>C. E. Whitehead<br>cewcathar@yahoo.com<br><p> 
<hr size=1><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/">Never miss an email again!<br>Yahoo! Toolbar</a> alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.<a href="
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49937/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/"> Check it out.</a>