<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">This is exactly the kind of carry-over of errors (based on same bad experiences of errors carried over from MARC into another part of 639) to which some, including myself, objected years ago, but the SIL block looks like being pushed through anyway. <DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>I still believe that it would be far better, even at this late state, to build each part of 639 ab initio, with due care for cultural concerns and consulting actual language groups at National Body level, as this is a better (older, more politically correct) protocol, rather than take such dangerous shortcuts as swallowing undigested SIL material. </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>mg</DIV><DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On 4 Dec 2006, at 17:06, scríobh <A href="mailto:Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com">Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com</A>:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">...<BR> <FONT size="2" face="sans-serif">However, the spelling "Alemannic" seems to be far more common than Alemanic. I'm wondering if that's a spelling mistake on SIL that I copied over assuming that resource to be authorative. If I were submitting this application today, I would use the spelling with two n's.</FONT> <BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><DIV> <DIV>- - </DIV><DIV>Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)</DIV><DIV>27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an </DIV><DIV>Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.</DIV><DIV>* <A href="mailto:mgunn@egt.ie">mgunn@egt.ie</A> * <A href="mailto:eamonn@egt.ie">eamonn@egt.ie</A> *</DIV> </DIV><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>