<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">+1 <BR><DIV><DIV>On 10 Nov 2006, at 23:52, scríobh Mark Davis:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">+1<BR><BR><DIV><SPAN class="gmail_quote">On 11/10/06, <B class="gmail_sendername">Peter Constable</B> <<A href="mailto:petercon@microsoft.com">petercon@microsoft.com</A>> wrote:</SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> From: <A href="mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no">ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</A> [mailto:<A href="mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no">ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</A>] On Behalf Of Michael Everson <BR><BR>>>Perhaps the ISO 15924 RA would like to suggest a alternative solution to<BR>>>its user community in view of the request for a solution?<BR>><BR>> It's not the RA's job to do that, really.<BR><BR> It *is* the RAs job to register tags that users want to use, and to service the user needs for which ISO 15924 was created. If the RA does't feel a particular user need should be met using the standard when users are suggesting that it should, then IMO the RA should be prepared to suggest where an alternative solution might lie. Just the the ISO 639 JAC needs to be prepared to do. <BR><BR><BR>> However, I (for my part) did suggest that the<BR>> following might be used:<BR><BR>Yes, but users are saying these alone are not considered sufficient for the needs, and you have not provided a solution to that extent...</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><DIV> <DIV>- - </DIV><DIV>Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)</DIV><DIV>27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an </DIV><DIV>Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.</DIV><DIV>* <A href="mailto:mgunn@egt.ie">mgunn@egt.ie</A> * <A href="mailto:eamonn@egt.ie">eamonn@egt.ie</A> *</DIV> </DIV><BR></BODY></HTML>