<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Mark wrote:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">>For German, de-150 and de-155 would include (high) German as spoken</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">>in Switzerland, but de-EU would not. de-EU would be broad enough for<br>
>german in DE/AT/LX however.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">For the record, the spoken dialect of high German most commonly used in Switzerland is now "gsw." de-150 would not include Switzerland's primary spoken dialect of German.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I'm having a hard time seeing where the EU distinction would be useful where the U.N. code would not unless you're talking about locale codes, which are distinct from RFC 3066bis language codes. Currency is not a component of language.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Do you have another use case you might want to share? I'm intrigued.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Regards,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Karen Broome</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Metadata Systems Designer</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Sony Pictures Entertainment</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">310-244-4384</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>