Latin Variants
Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutenauer at normalesup.org
Fri Mar 11 13:05:35 CET 2016
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:57PM +0000, Michael Everson wrote:
> As a publisher of Latin I would be interested in options for i/j/u/v but the scheme you propose doesn’t seem to take this into account, being defined by period (which is problematic) rather than by orthography.
I'm willing to submit registration forms for that. According to your
observations, that coincide with mine, there are three different common
variants:
> 1. Use of i for /i, j/ and u for /u, v/ throughout.
> 2. Use of i for /i, j/ and u for /u/ and v for /v/.
> 3. Use of i for /i/ and j for /j/ and u for /u/ and v for /v/.
What subtags should we use for them? I really have no idea.
Best,
Arthur
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list