request for subtag for Elfdalian

[Martin J. Dürst]

On 2016/03/08 06:25, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2016, at 20:54, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:

>> But you can't expect the RA to make those assumptions without providing evidential information. I'm just questioning critiques made of the RA's decision in regard to a proposal with only certain information provided, and making suggestions on what other kinds of information might be provided.
>
> What should happen? Should we include paradigm tables? A description of the historical phonology?

Probably not. But an explanatory sentence and a pointer might be 
appropriate, if we want to point them to the fact that they should 
(re?)consider the linguistic side of things.

Regards,   Martin.