No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

Mark Davis ☕️ mark at macchiato.com
Wed Mar 25 15:42:53 CET 2015


Either 1 or 2 are far better than 3.


Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis>

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> With no additional discussion for over a week on which of these three
> courses is best to take with "en-GB-oed":
>
> 1) deprecate and create "en-oxendict"
> 2) deprecate and create "en-oxford" (Addison, March 7)
> 3) leave it alone (John, March 7)
>
> I'm assuming there really isn't enough consensus to post any forms to
> the list at all. I will post forms for (1) or (2) if Michael directs me
> to do so.
>
> The three forms I posted on March 11 are still up for review through
> next Wednesday, March 25, after which either Michael will forward them
> to IANA or he will not, as he decides.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20150325/91dc846c/attachment.html>


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list