Deprecating grandfathered tags redux
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Sat Mar 7 18:24:52 CET 2015
> 5. i-mingo
>
> Kent suggested deprecating this with a P-V of "see-mingo", where 'see'
> is Seneca. John agreed.
If we create this variant, do we violate the SHALL NOT in Section 3.4,
item 17 below?
> Many of the grandfathered tags are deprecated -- indeed, they
> were deprecated even before [RFC4646]. For example, the tag
> "art-lojban" was deprecated in favor of the primary language
> subtag 'jbo'. These tags could have been made 'redundant' by
> registering some of their subtags as 'variants'. The 'variant-
> like' subtags in the grandfathered registrations SHALL NOT be
> registered in the future, even with a similar or identical
> meaning.
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list