No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

["Martin J. Dürst"]

On 2015/04/01 18:30, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:

> If we can take care of that handful, then it allows them (their canonical
> equivalents) to be used in a wider range of software. That's the point of
> this entire exercise. We've managed to get consensus on all but:
> i-default, i-mingo, en-GB-oed
>
> And we appear to be close on en-GB-oed...

Hello Mark,

I think that there was quite a bit of consensus on the fact that it will 
be extremely difficult (read: impossible) to get rid of, or replace, 
i-default.

Regards,   Martin.