Re: Descriptions for Volapük variants

[Philip Newton]

2012/1/17 John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org>:
> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>
>> I think the '1931' subtags are MUCH less mnemonic, and doubt that the
>> additional precision (if any) is really helpful for language tagging
>> purposes. I would much rather see rigik/nulik or jleyer/dejong or
>> schleyer/dejong.
>
> I strongly agree, and think that schleyer/dejong are far and away the best
> and clearest.

I agree.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>