pseudo-localization variants

[Yury Tarasievich]

I was wondering about that. So how complete must 
a documentation on lingual system be, for it to 
get IETF-ly recognised at all?

On 12/19/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2012, at 05:07, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Um... it generally _is_ in a real language. Just orthographically different.
>
> In a repeated, standardized way? Or in a random, ad-hoc way?
>
> Lorem ipsum is Latin, sort of. It differs from real Latin in matters of spelling and grammar.