proposed ISO 639 change for "arn"

[Doug Ewell]

Gordon P. Hemsley <gphemsley at gmail dot com> wrote:

> Bringing this back on topic, it doesn't seem like either of these
> designations would be appropriate here. I still think the simplest
> thing to do would be to simply deprecate "arn" and issue a new code
> for the language, despite the ramifications it will have on deployed
> software; doing anything else would have more complicated (and,
> potentially, more serious) ramifications, I think.

Not only the simplest thing, but the Right Thing™.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell ­