ISO 639-3 2011 changes: ikt
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Thu Aug 9 15:27:28 CEST 2012
Philip Newton wrote:
> My main concern was that the proposed change in the registry did not
> seem to represent accurately the change that ISO 639 made, but that
> appears to have been based on a misunderstanding on my part. (Perhaps
> the "summary of changes" was not quite as clear as it could have been
> about the effect of this particular change, or perhaps I'm simply not
> used to the format it uses to indicate such changes.) Thank you for
> the clarification.
I think the RA's explanation of their disposition is not merely unclear,
but erroneous—though, again, it has little or no impact on the
Registry.
Thanks for reading the posted Registry changes carefully.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list