Ietf-languages Digest, Vol 103, Issue 28

[João Miguel Neves]

Hi,

Ok, this is enough for me to write the official proposals.

One correction: 1990aolp has an official vocabulary in
http://www.portaldalinguaportuguesa.org/ (Vocabulário Ortográfico do
Português).

The same doubt I had presented to António: Why is the 1931 missing from
the list?

I don't think the pre1911 makes sense given that there are several
reforms before. I'm in favor of waiting for someone to need anything
before 1911 (the guy behind http://www.dicionario-aberto.net/ told me
he'll probably need it, so it won't take much time).

So, I'll fit the proposals to the templates for 1990aolp and 1945cil.
Please tell me if the emails you want to be credited in are the ones you
used on the mailing-list or not.

I have no problems doing the others after I understand why 1931 is out.

Best regards,
João Miguel Neves

Em 12-09-2011 12:56, Francisco Miguel Valada escreveu:
>
> António Emiliano asked me to check the subtags, links and references.
>
> And we drafted the following proposal:
>
>
>
> > Subtag: pre-1911 / pre1911 [hyphen?]
> > Link: ---------------------
> > Reference: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/31552/31552-pdf.pdf
> >
> > Subtag: 1911buo *
> > Link: http://dre.pt/pdfgratis/1911/09/21300.pdf
> > Reference: http://purl.pt/424
> >
> > Subtag: 1945cil **
> > Link: http://dre.pt/pdfgratis/1945/12/27300.pdf
> > Reference: Grande Dicionário Língua Portuguesa, Porto: Porto 
> > Editora, 2004.
> >
> > Subtag: 1990aolp
> > Link: http://dre.pt/pdfgratis/1991/08/193A00.pdf
> > Reference: ***
> >
> >
> >
> > * Bases para a Unificação da Ortografia
> > O nome oficial da reforma é "bases para a unificação da ortografia 
> > que deve ser adoptada nas escolas e nos documentos e publicações 
> > oficiais", Cf. http://dre.pt/pdfgratis/1911/09/20600.pdf, p. 6
>  
> EN - The official name of the reform is: "bases para a unificação da 
> ortografia que deve ser adoptada nas escolas e nos documentos e 
> publicações oficiais", Cf. http://dre.pt/pdfgratis/1911/09/20600.pdf, 
> p. 6 [bases for the unification/unifying the orthography which shall 
> be adopted by schools and for use in official publications and 
> documents]
>  
>  
> > ** Conferência Interacadémica de Lisboa de 1945
> > O Decreto n.º 35:228 aprova os resultados da Conferência 
> > Interacadémica de Lisboa de de 10.8.1945 em harmonia com a 
> > Convenção Luso-Brasileira de 29.12.1943 [Convenção para a unidade, 
> > ilustração e defesa do idioma comum].
>  
> EN - The 1945 decree approves the results of the Lisbon Interacademic 
> Conference, in accordance to the Luso-Brazilian Convention of 1943
>  
> *** There is not an official authoritative reference for the 1990 
> reform, besides the text of the "Agreement"; several dictionaries 
> have published which claim to be AOLP1990-compliant but the text of 
> the treaty (article 2) states that a Common Vocabulary must be 
> compiled with the collaboration of all the signatories.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> *
> **Francisco Miguel Valada*
>
>
> +32479855056
> fmvalada at hotmail.com
>
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20110912/a106c589/attachment-0001.html>