Applying for a Neo Subtag
Mark Davis ☕ (sıʌɐp ʞɹɐɯ)
mark at macchiato.com
Mon Mar 7 20:49:05 CET 2011
No, you can't ditch them all; not saying you can.
Particles or word order are so very much simpler than inflections for one of
the key problems we are faced with: parameter substitution. That is,
substituting variables in sentences templates like "{person} viewed {number}
{things} on {date}". Inflexions would be ok if they were perfectly regular
and never overlapped with other words—but that never happens, so they are
extremely painful.
Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:09, John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Mark Davis â?? (sıÊ?É?p Ê?ɹÉ?ɯ) scripsit:
>
> > Unfortunate that so many of the artificial languages chose to use
> > inflections and gender; if you're going to go to all the bother of
> > inventing an artificial language, you might as well get rid of that
> > baggage as well.
>
> Inflection, particles, word order: you can't ditch them all. Esperanto
> goes for inflection for conversion, TAM and noun case, particles for
> everything else, leaving word order for pragmatic relationships.
>
> I don't know of any auxlang with grammatical gender.
>
> --
> John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos --Lithuanian proverb
> Deus dedit dentes; deus dabit panem --Latin version thereof
> Deity donated dentition;
> deity'll donate doughnuts --English version by Muke
> Tever
> God gave gums; God'll give granary --Version by Mat McVeagh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20110307/9e98bd58/attachment.html>
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list