Applying for a common Moroccan Amazigh subtag
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Wed Jan 5 10:14:41 CET 2011
CE Whitehead scripsit:
> One quick question: will codes such as standardized Amazigh that are
> related to collection codes ever be mapped to the related code? That
> is, could a code such as [zgh] if it were registered ever be mapped to
> [ber] the way language codes are mapped to macro-languages in iso 639-3
> (for example [arb] is mapped to [ar])? (Sorry to ask a dumb question.)
There are no formal mappings in any standard between collection codes and
either individual language codes or macrolanguage codes, nor should there be.
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
"Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U." --K.X.U.
More information about the Ietf-languages