Registry changes - ISO 3166-1

[Philip Newton]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 18:33, CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Doug, another nit:
> http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2011-August/011071.html
>
> For the subtag [BQ],
> "Description: Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba"
> { Could not there be an additional comment between "Sint Eustatius" and "and
> Saba"? }
> => ??
> "Description: Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba"
> I leave it up to you though.

The source standard (ISO 3166) does not have that comma. I think it's
best to take the spelling from the source standard for such things
(which is why the proposal is changing "Saint" to "Sint" in the first
place, so that our spelling would remain the same as in the source).

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>