Records and registration forms for BQ, CW, SX, AN
CE Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 18 19:50:47 CET 2010
Hi.
Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
Fri Dec 17 23:54:50 CET 2010
> Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote:
>> (for AN)
>> > Comments: see BQ, CW, and SX
>>
>> BQ is (now) part of the Netherlands, while CW and SX are not (IIUC).
>> Maybe that need not be mentioned in the registry, or should it?
> Perhaps the BQ entry could include:
> Comments: see also NL
> I'm wondering how relevant this political detail is to language tagging,
> considering the distance between Europe and the Antilles.
I don't think that at present this has much influence on the variety -- so it's up to you.
However, thanks for checking on (French part) and (Dutch part) -- I think this information should be included.
Best,
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20101218/71bf6342/attachment.html>
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list