Missing subtags 003 and 172

Mark Davis ☕ mark at macchiato.com
Sun Aug 1 06:03:46 CEST 2010


I'm glad we're ok on 003. As I said, I'll go back to the CLDR committee
about 172.

Mark

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 20:26, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> I do not object to registering 003 according to Mark's proposal form, as
> long as it is generally agreed by the Reviewer and list membership that
> doing so is within the letter and spirit of RFC 5646.
>
> I do feel that both 003 and 021 should have a brief Comments field to
> describe the difference between them.  Something on the order of "Comments:
> Includes Caribbean and Central America; see also 021" would be appropriate.
>  A big long explanation is not necessary.
>
> I continue to object to 172 on the grounds that that code element is
> classified solely under the economic categories.
>
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20100731/e65248bd/attachment.html>


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list