Language codes

[Doug Ewell]

"Lang Gérard" <gerard dot lang at insee dot fr> wrote:

> Yes, I think it would be useful to correct "nine" to "ten" inside line 
> six of section 2.4 of RFC 5645.

Technically, it's not possible to change an RFC once it has been 
published.  You can file an erratum against the RFC, which is then 
accessible along with the document from the RFC Editor site.  See 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php for instructions.  Or, if you like, 
I will file it.

If the erratum mentions that "nine" should be "ten", then it should also 
add a bullet-point paragraph for 'SU' similar to the existing one for 
'FX'.

Please note, again, that this issue does not in any way affect the 
contents of the Registry, nor the process by which it was constructed, 
since 'SU' is already in the Registry.

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s