Machine Translation

[Doug Ewell]

Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:

>> ...the Reviewer ... is expected to be an expert as well as a referee, 
>> much more than (say) a WG chair.  His or her opinion on technical 
>> merits does count more than yours or mine.
>
> I certainly don't see that stated anywhere. Rather, 3.2 of RFC 5646 
> states...

You're right, it's not stated.  I guess I thought it was conventional 
wisdom.

> Note: the Reviewer needs to be informed enough to make use of the 
> contribution of experts, not to make unilateral choices.

I certainly never said the Reviewer should act unilaterally.

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s