Anomaly in upcoming registry

[Doug Ewell]

CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:

> in this case I actually don't object to 'un-deprecating' the code 
> element [sh] except that since we do have a three-letter code element 
> for the same macrolanguage, and since we do have both two-letter and 
> three-letter macrolanguage codes, it's almost unecessary labor to 
> 'un-deprecate' it.

Well, when you do find 'hbs' in the Registry or in the drafts, be sure 
to let us know.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ