Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU

[Doug Ewell]

"Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon dot com> wrote:

> As for the issue of countries that separate, there is no reason that I
> can see to address it further in any draft, past or future, of BCP 47.
> When new countries are formed, they are always formed from all or part
> of an old region (even Antarctica has a code). UN M.49 and ISO 3166-1
> assign any new regions codes, which we use as subtags. There are quite
> detailed and clear rules in the current RFC for how this is to be
> done.

I agree, and furthermore, as long as the LTRU WG is active, this is not 
the venue to discuss changes to BCP 47.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ