Proposal to remove Preferred-Value field for region YU in LTRU

[Mark Davis]

I agree with John and Doug.

Mark


On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 13:13, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:

> Doug Ewell scripsit:
>
> > As part of the production of a replacement Registry in draft-4645bis, it
> > has been proposed to remove the Preferred-Value from "YU" -- as an LTRU
> > change -- and optionally replace it with a Comments field such as
> > "Comments: see BA, HR, ME, MK, RS, or SI".
>
> IMHO we should have LTRU go ahead and do this.  When a new Registry is
> installed, it should be as accurate and up-to-date as possible.  There is
> no point in deferring this one change -- after all, in principle almost
> *all* the new registry changes allowed by 4646bis could be deferred to
> this list, but what's the point?
>
> Furthermore, despite the technical distinction between LTRU and
> ietf-languages, the person involved is the same, our very own Official
> Doug.
>
> --
> Do what you will,                       John Cowan
>   this Life's a Fiction                cowan at ccil.org
> And is made up of                       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan<http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
>   Contradiction.  --William Blake
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20090221/08129ed1/attachment-0001.htm