Disposition of hepburn?

["Martin J. Dürst"]

Seconded!    Martin.

On 2009/12/12 8:30, John Cowan wrote:
> Frank Bennett scripsit:
>
>> I have posted for the deprecation of "heploc", but I am unsure what to
>> do with "hepburn".  Were I to start the process again from scratch, I
>> would file for alalc97 only, and there would be no "hepburn" subtag.
>> However, "hepburn" potentially captures Japanese transliterations that
>> do not conform to the ALA-LC tables, so I am a little unsure of the
>> proper way forward.
>
> Hepburn is definitely wider than heploc/alalc97.  I suggest a comment
> be added saying "See also alalc97", but otherwise left alone.
>

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp