niall.tracey at logica.com
Fri Sep 26 11:37:45 CEST 2008
Michael Everson said on 25 September 2008 19:36
On 25 Sep 2008, at 18:07, Peter Constable wrote:
> > From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> > [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> > ] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
> > > I found Niall's analogy to be both offensive and inapplicable, and I
> > > did not wish to say so explicitly.
> > His Scandanavian analogy?
> No, the racial one.
If it's offensive or inapplicable, then you should feel free to say so. We're all adults here.
It maybe wasn't the best analogy I've ever used in my life, and it's certainly a very sensitive topic, but I wanted to illustrate the very human tendency to generalise and how ... well... offensive that can be.
Our discussions of our own languages take into account social and emotional factors -- we had Belarusians here tell us that "narkamurka" was offensive, and this was noted and dealt with. We haven't had any equivalent input from the Far Eastern community, and we're willing to make judgements on a seemingly purely technical basis. It just doesn't look like we're giving equal treatment from where I'm sitting -- it looks like small differences in European languages are getting more attention than similar eastern equivalents.
I'm perfectly happy to be told I'm wrong.
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
More information about the Ietf-languages