cowan at ccil.org
Thu Sep 25 17:51:38 CEST 2008
Peter Constable scripsit:
> Isn't that ignoring the politics of the region? By analogy, suppose
> Hindi orthography were a perfectly sufficient basis for transliterating
> Tamil: that wouldn't mean that Tamil speakers would have no objections
> to tagging their transliterated content "ta-hindi". Maybe "pinyin"
> isn't a problem for speakers of other languages, but I wouldn't want
> to assume that without investigation.
In the case of the Chinese government vs. the minority languags, quantity
has a quality all its own. These official romanizations may lack many
things, but they don't lack officialness.
So they play that [tune] on John Cowan
their fascist banjos, eh? cowan at ccil.org
--Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
More information about the Ietf-languages