BCP47 Appeals process
petercon at microsoft.com
Fri Sep 19 04:34:49 CEST 2008
My comments were most certainly in relation to a generic subtag. You referred to "yyyyacad" subtags as generic, but others had already explained the precedents on this list to you: those subtags are not generic.
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Yury Tarasievich
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:52 AM
To: ietf-languages at iana.org
Subject: Re: BCP47 Appeals process
Peter Constable wrote:
> We were discussing a generic-looking tag "academy", not "1959acad".
No, we were not. There was sort of authoritative message early on (ca.
middle of August last decade), saying we have to keep the discussion to
the specific tag (personally, I wanted *it* to be the *generic* tag from
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages