BCP47 Appeals process
prosfilaes at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 19:48:24 CEST 2008
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Yury Tarasievich
<yury.tarasievich at gmail.com> wrote:
> I find this unconvincing.
> Such reasoning effectively forbids about every meaningful and short
> description of language variant/lingual norm etc.
> Lots of those were codified in academies,
> It's only the *sub*-tag, it has *no* meaning
> per se, without its main tag.
That's wrong; if this tag gets registered, -akadem or whatever will
mean the Belarusian Academic orthography. de-akadem will be absurd but
legal, meaning the Belarusian academic orthography of German.
More information about the Ietf-languages