Pending business

Ihar Mahaniok mahaniok at gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 16:50:31 CEST 2008


no, Doug,

both those are Cyrillic, since both of them are "standard" way of
writing Belarusian.

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> We have three outstanding registration requests, one for the "Academy"
>> romanization of Belarusian (as distinct from Taraskievica), one for
>> Pinyin (however that is defined), and one for Wade-Giles.
>
> Regarding Belarusian, for "romanization" please read "Latin-script
> orthography."  I apologize for the error but trust everyone knew what I
> meant.
>
> I got a private response:
>
>> IIUC both Taraskievica and "Academy" are Cyrillic orthographies for
>> Belarusian, not Latin orthographies, thus not romanisations.
>
> Actually these are Latin orthographies; the "standard" way of writing
> Belarusian is in Cyrillic.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
> http://www.ewellic.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list