yury.tarasievich at gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 14:54:02 CEST 2008
Doug Ewell wrote:
> I got a private response:
>> IIUC both Taraskievica and "Academy" are Cyrillic orthographies for
>> Belarusian, not Latin orthographies, thus not romanisations.
> Actually these are Latin orthographies; the "standard" way of writing
> Belarusian is in Cyrillic.
How did the Latin ever come into this?? The Belarusian, both academy and
taraskievitsa, is Cyrillic.
And the valid *romanisations* are the BGN/PCGN, ISO 9, ALA and Scientific.
More information about the Ietf-languages