4646 bug ? (was: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (R3): pinyin)
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Sun Sep 7 00:22:34 CEST 2008
Michael Everson wrote:
>> I also note: if ‘zh’ is given as a prefix now,
>> ‘zh-latn’ can be added later. The converse is
>> *also* true.
> Well if that is the case, why not both now?
Information loss: If we want to use the registry
as our means to "bind" pinyin with Latn, then we
can have only any-Latn prefixes, starting with
zh-Latn for now.
If we'd want the registry to "bind" pinyin with
zh we would allow only zh-any prefixes. Clearly
this is not the case, cmn prefixes will be added
What is missing here might be a Suppress-Script
for variants. Or a more general way to record
"subtag relations" in the registry.
Maybe 4646bis should replace record-jar by RDF ?
More information about the Ietf-languages