Sign Languages and early 639 standards
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Mon Oct 6 21:01:55 CEST 2008
Chris Cox scripsit:
> the absence of sign languages until 639-3 has IMO nothing to do with
> recognition as languages but to do with the requirement for proof of some 50
> published works in the language to qualify for a two or three letter
> representation and name.
The works need not be published. See
http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/criteria2.html for details.
It would be easy to find five institutions which among them hold 50 or
more videos with sign-language content.
--
There is no real going back. Though I John Cowan
may come to the Shire, it will not seem cowan at ccil.org
the same; for I shall not be the same. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth,
and a long burden. Where shall I find rest? --Frodo
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list