ISO 639 JAC decision re mo/mol
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Thu Nov 6 15:22:16 CET 2008
CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
> Basically I like Doug's suggestions for comments and also Debbie's
> that we wait before implementing any suggestions for comments.
My suggestion was that we do not need any additional comments. The
Description fields should speak for themselves in this case.
> I do have a slight problem with specifying Moldovan as just an
> alternate name for Romanian because, as I understand things, it is
> Romanian as spoken in Moldova. But otherwise fine!
That's exactly what we do with "Dutch" and "Flemish", again reflecting
the ISO 639 names. Flemish is Dutch as spoken in Belgium.
--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list