ID for language-invariant strings
Frank Ellermann
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Thu Mar 20 08:45:44 CET 2008
<Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com> wrote:
> it sounds like they will support the "not applicable" tag
[...]
> but that they think it should be a new tag.
SNAFU. Peter replied:
| the JAC is *not* discussing creation of a new tag; rather,
| they are discussing the addition of "not applicable" as an
| alternate term describing "zxx".
Good.
> I don't know who on this list actually gets to weigh in on
> 639-2.
Apparently Peter (or John ?) killed "ork" and fixed "mis",
but couldn't do anything about "eur" after the fact.
Frank
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list