wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs
Frank Ellermann
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Aug 26 08:45:44 CEST 2008
Doug Ewell wrote:
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/faq.html#24
Thanks, I didn't recall that point, maybe it was
added after RFC 4646 got its number.
| Chinese is the same in its written form for
| Cantonese and Mandarin
Is that correct ? This does not simply mean "same
script", John's explanation here some weeks ago was
clearer.
Frank
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list