Erzgebirgisch Classification Question
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Thu Apr 3 04:01:03 CEST 2008
Ciarán Ã? DuibhÃn scripsit:
> Thomas has magnanimously accepted "sxu",
> but back in January he gave his reasons for regarding Erzgebirgisch as a
> form of Franconian (and I assume Franconian would have prefix "de").
Not necessarily: there are a number of ISO 639-3 languages that are said
to be Franconian (unfortunately the term seems to cover the whole course
of the Rhine from Upper German to Dutch varieties).
--
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list