Erzgebirgisch Classification Question

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Thu Apr 3 04:01:03 CEST 2008


Ciarán � Duibhín scripsit:

> Thomas has magnanimously accepted "sxu",
> but back in January he gave his reasons for regarding Erzgebirgisch as a
> form of Franconian (and I assume Franconian would have prefix "de").  

Not necessarily: there are a number of ISO 639-3 languages that are said
to be Franconian (unfortunately the term seems to cover the whole course
of the Rhine from Upper German to Dutch varieties).

-- 
John Cowan      cowan at ccil.org        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list