be-tarask language subtag registration form

[Peter Constable]

I definitely think that, if there's a distinction worth coding, then both variants need to be coded.


Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Frank Ellermann
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 1:34 AM
To: ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: be-tarask language subtag registration form

zedlik wrote:

> in Internet Taraskievica is used much oftener than Narkamauka

If that's the case it could be better to register both variants,
maybe using "1933" or "1959" for the official orthography.

The application I've in mind are spell checkers, they could ask
the user or pick a user defined default for "be" texts without
variant, and otherwise they'd use "tarask" vs. "1993" or "1959".

Frank


_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages