Suppress-Script for Korean?

[CE Whitehead]

Karen, I'm not the expert; that's for sure; but it's my guess that 
Suppress-script is used for the most widely used contemporary form of the 
language/script -- in cases where the languages is still spoken today.
As for suppress-script for ancient languages, how it works/would work, I 
will not venture a guess.

--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
>Randy,
>
>I realize you're the expert here, but based on what I read, pure Hiragana
>and Katakana may have been more popular in the past or for informal use. I
>believe the pure forms were also used by women in the past.
>
>So, question: When we use Suppress-Script, do we consider historical forms
>of the language, or is this designation only considered in terms of
>current use? Raising this issue with Hiragana made me realize that I don't
>know the answer to this question.
>
>Randy writes:
>
> >For a document longer than a few words to be purely "Hira" would be
>*very*
> >artifical, and consequently I'd expect it to be marked as such, just as
> >an extended document solely in Kanji or Katakana would also be quite
>artifical.
>
>Regards,
>
>Karen Broome
>Sony Pictures Entertainment


>_______________________________________________
>Ietf-languages mailing list
>Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

_________________________________________________________________
http://liveearth.msn.com