Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c RESUBMISSION
Ciarán Ó Duibhín
ciaran at oduibhin.freeserve.co.uk
Tue Jan 23 03:32:34 CET 2007
Thanks, but I need to ask further: if "frx" is the hypothetical French
macrolanguage, do you mean that "frx-1694" could co-exist with "fr-1694" (in
which case, why cannot "fr-1694" and "frm-1694" co-exist)? Or do you mean
that something like "frx-fr-1694" could co-exist with "fr-1694" but
"frx-1694" could not?
Ciarán Ó Duibhín.
Addison Phillips wrote:
> Subtags may have many prefixes... as many as necessary.
> Ciarán Ó Duibhín wrote:
> > C E Whitehead wrote:
> > <<
> > I have not resubmitted the proposals since then. I am asking permission
> > I gather thought that I can from another list member's private email to
> > so I'll get to that in a minute; there is just one prefix now with each
> > subtag; I must await a macrolanguage tag for French before trying to
> > associate any other prefix (which would be the macrolanguage tag)
> > >>
> > Would acceptance of CE's present proposals still allow these two to be
> > subtags of a future French macrolanguage (in case that might be CE's
> > preferred long-term solution), or would that be ruled out as again
> > associating each subtag with two prefixes?
More information about the Ietf-languages