ISO 639 name change: Songhai languages
cowan at ccil.org
Sat Jan 6 07:51:21 CET 2007
Don Osborn scripsit:
> So in such a case
> are they languages in one direction and dialects in the other? And the
> ensemble a macrolanguage from one angle and a language group from another?
Ethnologue, which is the basis of 639-3, is an extreme splitter: if they
say that two varieties are dialects of a single language, it's unlikely
that anyone will divide them more finely, with a few sporadic exceptions
So macrolanguage is the appropriate level between individual language and
language group in cases where a two-sided view is required.
> (Hence ISO-639-2 "son" might indeed be appropriate for a locale
> for certain purposes - I can't say for sure that it is, but IMO it certainly
> shouldn't be ruled out.)
No one is trying to do so.
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Economists were put on this planet to make astrologers look good.
More information about the Ietf-languages