Reshat Sabiq's requests for two Tatar orthographic variants

[Doug Ewell]

John Cowan <cowan at ccil dot org> wrote:

> However, the Azeri name for the 1929-39 alphabet means "uniform Turkic 
> alphabet", which looks promising because that name is not being used 
> today.  How about "uniturk"?

Fine with me, for whatever that's worth.  (I wrote my last post before 
discovering that Reşat disapproves of "panturk".)

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages