Scottish English (was: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM)

Debbie Garside debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Fri Aug 24 10:28:15 CEST 2007


As we use en-GB and en-US it would seem appropriate to use en-Scotland.
This could then be replaced if a 3166-1 code ever becomes available.

Best

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of
> Michael Everson
> Sent: 24 August 2007 08:38
> To: Doug Ewell; ietf-languages at iana.org
> Subject: Re: Scottish English (was: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM)
>
> At 22:34 -0700 2007-08-23, Doug Ewell wrote:
> >I agree, without using arithmetic notation, with Karen's proposal to
> >register a variant for Scottish English, with the full understanding
> >that this would encompass both Glaswegian and Edinburgeois, possibly
> >too coarse a distinction for purposes other than Karen's.
>
> What are the advantages/disadvantages/implications for:
>
> en-scottish
> en-scotland
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
>
>






More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list