be-tarask
Doug Ewell
dewell at adelphia.net
Tue Apr 24 17:14:14 CEST 2007
Jeremy Carroll <jjc at hpl dot hp dot com> wrote:
> It seems to allow for the word 'classical' to appear in the
> registration, but as a book title; and hence allows us to proceed
> without having to adjudicate on whether that title is or is not an
> appropriate one
Jaska never said it was part of a book title. This is an unfortunate
misunderstanding that keeps being repeated. Jaska wrote:
> This is the title given by the book mentioned in references in the
> form.
using the word "title" to mean "more-or-less official name given to the
orthography," and Yury interpreted this as being part of a book title,
which was not Jaska's intent.
I recommend that the Reviewer declare a second two-week review period,
although I don't know if it will accomplish much in getting the two
sides ("definitely must say 'classic'" versus "definitely must not say
'classic'") to agree on this.
--
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list