be-tarask
Doug Ewell
dewell at adelphia.net
Mon Apr 23 16:07:46 CEST 2007
Clearly, if one side says there is controversy and the other side says
there is none, there is controversy.
Question for all: Are there any likely users of this subtag who would
not understand the term "Taraskievica" or its relationship to the subtag
value "tarask", and would need the word "classical" to help them
understand the meaning of the subtag?
It is not our place to make value judgments on languages, scripts,
orthographies, etc. and calling one orthography "classic" or "classical"
clearly is seen by one side as a value judgment. If this cannot be
resolved, it may be that the Reviewer will need to ask for an additional
two-week review period so the principals can iron this out.
--
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list