be-tarask

[Doug Ewell]

CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:

> What ever happened to be-tarask???
> Just curious.

Good point.  This registration request passed its two-week review period 
a week ago, and in the meantime we focused on getting 'baku1926' and 
'syc' registered and debating the correct use of 'mis' and the correct 
way to tag programming languages.

Here is the subtag as requested by Jaska Zedlik on March 31:

Type: variant
Subtag: tarask
Description: Belarusian in Taraskievica orthography
Prefix: be
Comments: Belarusian in so called classical orthography or Taraskievica

I believe we ended up with a consensus on the subtag 'tarask'.

I'd like to propose deleting the Comments line, since the "classical" 
designation turned out to be controversial and the rest is a duplication 
of the Description.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages