"mis" update review request

[Michael Everson]

At 23:42 -0700 2007-04-13, Doug Ewell wrote:

>I suspect this whole debate over "mis" is more of a 
>thought-experiment, based on what might happen when those who treat 
>"mis" liberally clash with those who treat it conservatively, rather 
>than developing out of any real conflict in usage.  I don't plan to 
>worry about it much.  We have enough difficulty ironing out the 
>real-world cases.

I rather agree. This "mis" discussion makes my eyes glaze over as it 
is not tied to language, but to some categories in the 639 standards. 
But as I have said I would like John Cowan to summarize the state of 
consensus on this one in a fortnight. I'm preparing for the WG2 
meeting in Frankfurt and am content to let you duke this one out on 
your own.
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com